Sb Gupta Monetary Economics Pdf 182

Quality assessment, study designs, and appraised economic evidence. The quality of economic studies was appraised systematically using the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) guidelines.

29 of the studies were identified as having a controlled trial design; a further 54 papers were deemed to be of an observational design. From the total papers (n=83), 21 were classified as having low or very low levels of economic evidence and 12 were assessed to have medium or higher levels of economic evidence.

Search Management. Figure 2 displays the PRISMA diagram. The majority of organisations performing systematic reviews of literature exist within the higher income countries and prioritise primary research that generate data.

At the start of the review, MS was critically ill (Multiple Sclerosis). It was initially decided that this would be a major exclusion, and this primary research would be removed from the systematic review; to do this, multiple sclerosis would need to be defined. It would need to be established, through clinical diagnosis, how someone with MS differed from healthy individuals. This would require that MS was appropriately diagnosed, biomarkers were being identified, and, potentially, that a clinical definition of MS was being validated.

Therefore, MS failed to fit this criteria for exclusion from the systematic review. For a number of reasons highlighted below, the clarity of the definitions of MS and the sub-sequent exclusion of MS from the systematic review were not fully established by the beginning of the systematic review. The systematic review was delayed due to this uncertainty.

Search Strategy. Search management identified the following electronic bibliographic databases for the primary search: Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Medline, and EconLit. After the primary search, all resulting full-text articles were imported into RefWorks, an electronic citation management program. d2c66b5586